Just say no deal to “Just Say No Deal”, the father website to PUMA voters!

I am in works of making ANTI-PUMA the new voice of reason against these republicans hurding the hurt and angry women.

I cannot do it alone!

I am going to need help!

If you would like to blog for ANTI-PUMA please leave a comment with your email and I will sign you up! Together we can ensure that PUMA has the wind taken out of her sails and that a Democratic President takes office in January of ‘09!

24 Responses to “Together we can STOP PUMA”

  1. LMS Says:

    I will help. PUMA’s are alot of hot air, and need to be putdown. Actually, ridiculing them is much easier.

  2. truthsquad Says:

    desperate times call for desperate actions

    U R pathetic ~ “stop PUMA” ~ WTF!

    a losing cause on your part

  3. Tom Says:

    I’m LMAO here. People can vote for whoever the hell they want to gang! America is not the middle east!

    Import Odinga! He’ll take care of them!

    Can my cat join HOUND? She says its discrimination not to let her join HOUND!

  4. Christina Says:

    “truthsquad”- I am pathetic? Yes, because I am exposing the founders and a large portion of the PUMA followers for the frauda that they are.
    Founder donates 500.00 to McCain in 2000, just HAPPENS to be gunning for him this election?
    Bowers encourages Harriet to make the “inadequate black male” video.
    And as of today I see that two very large puma sites are registered in HUGE red states.

  5. Christina Says:

    Tom- are you “big deal” or tom? lol.
    Nice fake names though.

  6. BBF Says:

    So sorry. Somehow I cannot bring myself to support a candidate who was a member of a church and had it’s minister as his “mentor” and “spiritual advisor”, the minister who preached “God Damn America”. Of course, he could no more disown his minister or his church anymore than he could disown his White grandmother (until the poll numbers started to go down). For some strange reason, I am suspicious of one who has a long and close association with the former Weatherman who posed standing on the American flag for a magazine cover. And then there’s Rezko. Some say that this is “guilt by association”, and it is unfair. Well, some others say, “the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree”.

  7. Christina Says:

    BBF- What about Hagee, or Parsley, or Haggard? They are all attached to Presidents and Presidential candidates.

    I don’t really care about religion or about a pastor going off the deep end 4 times in a 30 year pastoral- as we all express harsh sentiments from time to time, but I cannot find one moment when Obama has expressed or exhibited the same sentiments OR the teachings of black liberation theology.

    It makes one wonder if Obama had done what ALL politicians and simply attached himself to a “arena” church in order to get his name out there and gain some traction to his name.

    I give Obama a pass on Trinity- because they do truly wonderful things for their city.

  8. Jeff Says:

    Looks like PUMA just met their match….
    Go Christina.

    I support yes to democracy completely as of this minute.

  9. Sallie Planty Says:

    Two members of a board to which I belong have joined PUMA and the hatred they post toward Barak Obama is palpable. I feel that this is more than wanting a woman president; it goes much deeper.
    PUMA is driven by hate and, as such, is a despicable movement. Count me in if there’s anything I can do….

  10. anu day Says:

    your site is very sad. i guess i should be glad in a way that obama folks are starting to take notice. this movement really has nothing to do with republicans nor anyone taking advantage of women, albeit john mccain may in fact benefit.

    lastly your comments are insulting, small and appear very desparate. good luck in your slander efforts as you are only pushing more folks to justsaynodeal.com .

  11. Steve Says:

    “Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?
    Because her father is Janet Reno.”

    -John McCain, June 1998, Rep. Fund-raiser

    http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25newsb.html

  12. Steve Says:

    Hillary made this statement on Sept. 1, 2007 regarding the DNC rules for the order of primaries,

    “We believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process. And we believe the DNC’s rules and its calender provide the necessary structure to respect and honor that role. Thus, we will signing the pledge to adhere to the DNC approved nominating calendar”
    Hillary Clinton Campaign, Sept. 1, 2007

    When Clinton realized that Obama’s campaign was threatening hers, she reversed her statement on respecting the DNC approved nominating calendar and starting spouting off about liberty, comparing the “denial of votes” to the denial of votes for African Americans in our country’s history. Such sick and twisted irony. The idea that so many people (supposedly) rally around this notion that justice and liberty were so crushed by the DNC is appalling to me.

    This is the statement issued by her campaign in Feb. 2008

    “With regard to Michigan and Florida, our position is clear. We’re going to ask our delegates to vote to seat the delegations from Florida and Michigan. We do not think that that many Americans should have their votes and their voices and their preferences denied. We had an enormous turn-out, in particular in Florida, the largest turnout in the history of the Democratic primary in Florida. And we believe that it is critically important that those delegates have an opportunity to express their preferences at the convention. I don’t believe that anyone seriously thinks that we are going to have a national convention in which the delegations of Florida and Michigan are not going to have a say. So that is our position.” Clinton Campaign Feb. 2008

    please respond to this PUMA

  13. Steve Says:

    oops, I almost forgot.

    http://www.plunderbund.com/2008/05/22/clintons-big-floridamichigan-flip-flop/

    please watch this video of Tim Russert (RIP) commenting on Hillary’s flip flop and interviewing a speechless Hillary supporter on the issue.

    will the PUMA people be as unable to make a comeback?

    I think so

  14. Jeff Says:

    I don’t think it’s necessary to waste any time organizing against two or three hundred muckrackers who will accomplish nothing more than serving as a novelty act for Neil Cavuto. When they can numerically demonstrate their ability to influence a single precinct, I might get a tiny concerned.

    Now I just wish I could compel myself to look away from the trainwreck that is No Quarter, hillaryis44, and pumapac, but reading what these ignorant and uneducated kooks have to say is at least morbidly entertaining.

  15. Hubris Says:

    Jeff, you and Stevo are just a couple more obamabots who are the “uneducated kooks”

    You have no clue, sadly, none.

  16. A puma supporter Says:

    In this year, 2008 the democratic party is NOT democratic. I say yes to democracy too! Bring back the party who counts every vote and who listens to the people. Bring back the party that supposibly fights for women rights.

    So bring this back together, bring back Hillary as the Nominee and we PUMA’s will stop instantly. You will unite the party and all will be good.

    Until that happens, I am sending money to John McCain and urging everyone I know NOT TO SUPPORT Obama.

  17. Tim Weaver Says:

    PUMAs have some legitimate gripes, but they voice them in a way that makes them seem like they might be stupid, and planning to vote for Mccain proves it.

  18. Brandy Betz Says:

    This is awesome. I actually emailed the company PUMA earlier to see how they feel about their name being co-opted. (Yes, I’m aware that pumas are also animals but I couldn’t email them. Their wi-fi is out).

  19. jkrincon Says:

    Well, I have been reading a lot of The Confluence and being honest with you, I still support Barack Obama and I would like to join this movement as long as we fight with arguments (valid ones) and encourage a healthy and open debate.
    Anyhow, count me in.

  20. Mogus Says:

    What’s really funny about the PUMAs is that they cry out from their rooftops about how Obama is Marxist and sexist.. and then refuse to allow comments on their own boards that criticize their candidate or stance. Heaven forbid someone point out to them that most of them support Hilary for the complete wrong reason (voting for a woman due to the fact that she’s a woman is the pinnacle of stupidity). Freedom of Speech? They love it, as long as it’s their speech. If it’s anyone else’s, then these Uppity Bloggers and River Daughters REEK of hypocrisy.
    Count me in.


  21. [...] 29, 2008 at 3:52 am I will help. PUMA’s are alot of hot air, and need to be putdown.. Actually, ridiculing them is much easier.” Now let’s see if I have this right, Ed [...]

  22. Mary Says:

    I am an older woman and am appalled that Hillary Clinton has not had the courage to condemn this Puma Campaign. She and Bill started this whole thing by spinning the primary results in their favor even though the result said something entirely different. Barack Obama would never have allowed this sort of thing to gain any traction but perhaps she is waiting for them to pay off her debt. I suspect Barack Obama would very seriously consider her for vice president but for the emotional manipulation. Yes she is a very talented woman but she full well that Barack Obama is extremely talented and will make a wonderful president plus he is willing to listen and get the help he needs. Who is thinking of themselves and not the country?

  23. BigMac Says:

    Together we can make John McCain the next President of the United States!!!!! McCain 08!!!!!!!!!


Leave a Reply